Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Wireman\s+W2DU\s+Current\s+Type\s+Balun\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: CEPitts <cpitts@ec.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 14:53:59 -0500
IMO can't go wrong with the Balun Design products. Nice selection, support, well worth the investment from what I believe is a quality product. Nothing negative about W2DU product so cannot speak to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00140.html (6,588 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 20:13:12 +0000
MyAntennas.com has top quality baluns, IMO better than Balun Designs. https://myantennas.com/wp/ 73, Maximo   --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00141.html (8,393 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 12:17:11 -0800
The one sent to me by another ham was very well built. Unfortunately, it did not measure anything like the plot that was on their website. When I asked a few questions, the plot disappeared. Comments
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00143.html (7,859 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 13:24:02 -0800
That's the only reason I can think of. The materials are inexpensive, especially if you buy the cores from industrial vendors in reasonable quantity, sharing those you don't need with fellow hams. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00145.html (8,280 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 20:47:22 -0600
The 1:1 shown is exactly the same as Balun Designs. Except for the housing. Jim W7RY https://myantennas.com/wp/ 73, Maximo --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00148.html (9,283 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 19:29:25 -0800
Do you know that it's the same ferrite mix? That makes a huge difference, and #31 the only one I've found that yields REPEATABLY good high Rs values at HF. #43 and #52, which can provide high enough
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00150.html (8,721 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim W7RY <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 22:40:46 -0600
No. I don't know that for sure. W7RY Do you know that it's the same ferrite mix? That makes a huge difference, and #31 the only one I've found that yields REPEATABLY good high Rs values at HF. #43 an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00153.html (9,183 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 03:02:30 -0500
Jim (K9YC), When making Rs measurements are you using the S11 or S21 method? Steve, G3TXQ was an advocate of S21 while Owen, VK2OMD claims S11 results in better accuracy with high Rs values. I've bee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00154.html (9,517 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 02:05:16 -0800
Hi Paul, I made S21 measurements using a test jig quite similar to Steve's. His measurement technique seemed quite good. The (major) shortcoming of his work is that he measured only chokes on only a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00156.html (9,571 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:52:21 +0000
Hi Jim, Happy Christmas. Regarding the test jig, Are you still using that one made of Teflon board with short coax tails to the D8SAQ ? Thanks 73, Máximo EA1DDO www.EA1DDO.es   --Original Message-- F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00157.html (10,576 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 12:18:46 +0000
Paul, there is a document somewhere showing S21 better (more accurate) results to S11. I need to look for that doc. 73, Máximo EA1DDO www.EA1DDO.es   Jim (K9YC), When making Rs measurements are you u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00158.html (10,911 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:15:53 -0800
73, Máximo EA1DDO www.EA1DDO.es There's a nice application note from Copper Mountain that looks at uncertainty in S11 vs S21 measurements of impedance.  As one might expect it varies with the magnitu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00165.html (9,978 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 08:15:59 -0800
I made S21 measurements using a test jig quite similar to Steve's. His measurement technique seemed quite good. The (major) shortcoming of his work is that he measured only chokes on only a few cores
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00166.html (11,505 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 11:51:34 -0800
No, that was to accommodate the very large cores. My standard jig is one that strongly resembles Steve's. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ ________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00171.html (9,692 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 12:00:46 -0800
On 12/25/2022 8:15 AM, Lux, Jim wrote: The material datasheet claims 20% uncertainty in the properties (although I don't know if that is "run to run" or "piece to piece within a run") - They're sinte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00172.html (11,024 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Richard Smith <n6kt1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 00:53:01 +0000 (UTC)
I can see that my initial request included far too few details. Thanks for the many good responses. The responses were very helpful for me. I'll try to refine my request.  1) Approximately 5000 ohms
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00180.html (12,302 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:10 +0000
Hi Rich, You can get a commercial choke showing in excess of 5K Ohm at 28 Mhz, up to 3Kw: https://myantennas.com/wp/product/cmc-130-3k/ If you prefer to build it yourself, you just need to follow Jim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00181.html (13,960 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Richard Smith <n6kt1@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:04:22 +0000 (UTC)
Hi Maximo, Thanks for directing me to the MyAntennas site. Their Choke Baluns and Common Mode Filter Chokes seem to have very good performance. Have you used them yourself? TNX and 73, Rich, N6KT On
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00182.html (14,142 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <ea1ddo@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 07:05:07 +0000
Hi Rich, Not myself, but someone else in this group. It seems the device shows on the field the advertised specifications. The guy behind it is a RF engineer, coming from Cushcraft antennas. I would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00183.html (15,175 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Wireman W2DU Current Type Balun (score: 1)
Author: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 05:18:37 -0700
https://www.onallbands.com/baluns-and-common-mode-impedance-how-much-is-enough/ On 12/26/2022 5:53 PM, Richard Smith wrote: I can see that my initial request included far too few details. Thanks for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00184.html (10,020 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu