Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Without\s+Benefit\s+of\s+Concrete\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: pelliott@flash.net (N3GPU)
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 01:28:34 -0400
You never know what you'll find when dismantling a tower... I was recently involved in dismantling the antennas of a silent key. One was a Mosley trap tribander on 50 feet of Rohn 25G, bracketed to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00310.html (10,274 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 12:18:54
Well, I'll 'fess up to being involved with a club that had 30 feet of Rohn 25 on top of a 9-story office building in downtown DC where the base of the tower was free-standing, held in place only by "
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00339.html (8,998 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rhummel@cheshire.net (Robert Hummel)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 09:48:34 -0400
At least two up here. I have nearly the same situation you describe. 50' of 25G bracketed to the house. Base is 4 ft in the ground, buried in 1.5-inch crushed stone. No guys installed -- none needed
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00341.html (8,780 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 10:23:11 +0000
FWIW, Rohn manufactures a drive in base for 25G that does not require any concrete. It is part number SDB25G and is similar to a regular concrete base plate except that a large flanged spike is welde
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00342.html (9,016 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 10:25:59 +0000
[snip] Bob, out of curiosity, how many house brackets and at what height? [snip] 73 Malcolm KR4HP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Admi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00343.html (8,753 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: wb4mnf@atl.org (Bob Duckworth)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 12:33:54 +0100
All ya'll I have 2 cents :-) If the engineering and cost analysis says, "CONCRETE" then concrete is warranted. If it says, 'pier pin', that's the way to go. If a spike base and two house brackets mee
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00346.html (8,850 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 12:49:39 +0000
Whoops!!! I didn't look far enough. In the 25G parts list, Rohn "stars" this base along with others that "...must be bracketed or guyed at all times." 73 Malcolm KR4HP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00349.html (9,597 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 11:19:19 -0600
Yep, the lateral forces at the base of a tower are quite small. The GUYS take the horizontal load, transfering it to a vertical load on the tower. It is my understanding that the limiting factor in t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00350.html (10,099 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: DavidHarper@tx.slr.com (DavidHarper@tx.slr.com)
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 13:52:36 -0500
If you put up a guyed tower without a concrete base (bottom section just stuck in the ground), be sure to check guywire tension on a regular basis. One well-known contester had a TH6DXX on about 50'
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00351.html (8,686 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rhummel@cheshire.net (Robert Hummel)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 09:56:51 -0400
One bracket about 3 feet below the peak of the roof (where the extension of both tower sides project onto the house). I used stock angle iron and U-bolts. Inside, 2x10 backing plate tied via cable t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00368.html (9,095 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rudder1@ibm.net (Malcolm Clark)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 10:09:05 +0000
OK, but how high is the roof. :-) Seriously, I (and I suspect others) am curious about the height of the bracket above the ground. 73 Malcolm KR4HP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkf
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00370.html (9,266 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: baycock@hiwaay.net (Bill Aycock)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 13:40:30 -0500
Robert- Do you understand that you did not answer the question? I would like to know how high, also. Bill- W4BSG (Who also has a driving curiosity) Bill Aycock W4BSG Jackson County, AL EM64vr W4BSG i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00382.html (9,350 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: rhummel@cheshire.net (Robert Hummel)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 16:03:39 -0400
to the needed. Base to bracket: 30 ft Above bracket: 10ft flat-top section. Above flattop: 10ft mast w/tribander Rotor (CDR-22) about 2ft below flattop One leg of dipole at 38ft. Base is 3-4ft below
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00383.html (9,231 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Without Benefit of Concrete (score: 1)
Author: andrew@gi0nwg.demon.co.uk (Andrew Williamson)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:03:29 +0100
Jeez, you guys must get very light winds. Towers like those listed above wouldn't last a week in GI. They wouldn't even last a day in the Winter time. Play it safe guys, put some concrete in the base
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00387.html (9,947 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu