Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+X9\s+or\s+C31XR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+X9\s+or\s+C31XR\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: k1uo@banet.net (Larry Emery); Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 17:25:00 -0400; Hi All, Does anyone have any first hand knowledge of which would "best" side mount directly to the 2 side legs of a Rohn 45 tower without the elements being overly close etc etc. AND...which of these; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00128.html (7,694 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 20:23:26 EDT; Are you going to rotate it or just leave it fixed? If it's fixed, just about anything will work just fine. A TH7 will turn around 45G on a 'swinging gate' sidemount and the distance between the middl; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00132.html (9,164 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: mcduffie@scottsbluff.net (Gary McDuffie, Sr.); Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 22:31:37 -0600; One thing I've wondered is what effect the vertical tower member has on the pattern, especially as size increases from R25 to R45, etc. I assume this has been modeled by someone. Gary -- -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00135.html (7,850 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan); Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 05:48:39 -0700; [...] [PURELY SUBJECTIVE OBSERVATION ALERT] The more and more I read about the "new Cushcraft," the more I appreciate what Force 12 has brought to the amateur antenna marketplace. Thanks, Tom! [END; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00140.html (8,511 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: jrdavis@crnotes.collins.rockwell.com (Jeffrey R Davis); Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 14:01:34 -0500; I'd like to confirm Dick's impressions: [IRRITATED FORMER CUSTOMER ALERT] I recently received a Cushcraft 17B2 which had some hidden damage, which probably occurred in shipping. Namely, the balun cas; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00178.html (11,023 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: amcastmis@earthlink.net (Jim); Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 16:12:50 -0700; Hey guys, Remember, we're talking about Cushcraft here. The company that participated in false advertising regarding the X9 and it's vapor-ware 2 element 40 meter add-on. When unable to deliver, they; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00181.html (12,539 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 19:26:06 PDT; I have an X9 - love it. EXCEPT: The SWR is screwy - varies with rain I think. And the antenna is at 100 feet. Bummer Three yagis bought from Cushcraft - three screwups. Each yagi had either missing p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00202.html (13,476 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: w1nr@eecorp.com (Michael McCarthy, W1NR); Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 22:43:20 -0400; Getting back to the question of X9 vs. C31XR... I made an inquiry to Cushcraft asking for any information they had about stacking X9's. After nearly a week, I got a response that basically read "We h; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00203.html (8,148 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] X9 or C31XR (score: 1): Author: jfleming@shelbynet.net (John Fleming (WA9ALS)); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:14:24 -0500; I've had some relatively minor problems with Cushcraft in the past dealing with replacing a trap for the R-7. The first time a few years ago, I felt like I was talking to some guy working out of his; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00315.html (16,109 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]