Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+and\s+tribander\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+XM240\s+and\s+tribander\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] XM240 and tribander question (score: 1): Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:02:56 -0600; I am putting together a modest contest station on North Caicos ( VP5 ). The tower will be 60 feet with a Tri-bander just above and the Cushcraft 2 ele 40 10 ft above that. (Cushcraft XM240 at 70 ft).; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00632.html (7,757 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] XM240 and tribander question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 23:35:59 EST; Hi, Bud -- An interesting read for you would be the N0AX and K7LXC tribander comparison report. We tested 7 different tribanders on-the-air and published the results. The report is 60 pages of protoc; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00637.html (7,962 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] XM240 and tribander question (score: 1): Author: zeitler@ibm.net (zeitler@ibm.net); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 04:59:33 -0800; Hi Bud et al, An intersting in regards to the X-7 (should also apply to the X-9) is that the beam seems to act like a rotary dipole or better on 17 meters. The San Diego Ham Radio Outlet store has an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00639.html (9,587 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] XM240 and tribander question (score: 1): Author: amcastmis@earthlink.net (Jim); Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:18:50 -0800; Hi Bud, I have an X-9. Overall, I'm fairly happy with it although it does have a high SWR on 20. It hears extremely well. Seems to get ok but not quite as well as I would have expected. Others I've t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00646.html (9,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]