Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Yagi\s+gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Yagi\s+gain\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 07:03:32 -0500 (EST); I regret that many of the notes, either to me or to the list, relative to the Cushcraft published gain number, have taken an unfortunate turn. They look like attempts to either support or detract fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00126.html (13,080 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: gj0nyg@geocities.com (Joe Bette-Bennett (GJ0NYG)); Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 17:43:24 +0000; All I know is that Cushcaft quote 14.0 dBd foward gain for their 617-6b Boomer, and K6STI's YO models it as 10.5 dBd free space gain. They were however willing, to send me the instruction manual, so; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00134.html (8,341 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz); Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 13:12:01 -0500; Hi LB, Bravo! Your latest critique in the "antenna gain spec wars" is another stake in the heart of self-serving commercial advertising and marketing interests that capitalize on sophisticated techni; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00136.html (9,124 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale Martin); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 23:55:52 -0600; Roger, You bring up an interesting point. Periodically, at different locations around the country, there is something called a mobile shoot-out. The mobile operators gather and run antenna tests with; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00144.html (9,592 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz); Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 20:52:30 -0500; Hi Dale, Thanks for your interesting question. The best answer I can give you is... that I have just received word from the author that the very tests we all would love to see run are indeed underway; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00146.html (9,795 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: jimnv3v@shore.intercom.net (Jim Bruce); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 21:29:13 -0500; Therin lies the problem, no defined standard of measurement that is accepted and used by all manufacturers. Currently everybody is free to use whatever they wish and publish the figures without any d; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00148.html (8,272 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: ftbrady@le.klever.net (Frank T. Brady); Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 20:54:33 -0800; What a *great* idea! And there would be no need to spend money purchasing antennas or wasting time testing overblown claims. Just solicit the manufactures for a loan of their antennas to test and lis; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00153.html (9,810 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Yagi gain (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 8 Nov 1997 06:49:57 -0600; N4KG comments follow - ......................................................................... ARRL is currently studying this very question for the purpose of listing antenna performance parameter; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00158.html (9,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]