Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Yet\s+another\s+used\s+W51\s+\(base\/foundation\)\s+\?\?\?\s+de\s+K6LPM\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: southbound suarez <southboundsuarez@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:50:44 +0000
Seems as if there's a huge proliferation of these towers out there. I'd dare say probably record production compared to any other Ham/private consumer tower if you exclude the 25G series. That said,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00046.html (10,642 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <cautery@montac.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:37:42 -0500
Tashjian Towers owns ALL of Tri-Ex's old engineering designs and makes spare parts for many of the older things.... You might try them.... Look at the website... drawings, et al. avail. http://www.ta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00047.html (8,147 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:34:06 -0600
In the amount of time it took you to type out this treatise, you could have called Tashjian Towers, ordered a new base, and then still had time left over to walk into the kitchen and make a nice turk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00048.html (12,200 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: KJ6Y--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 19:56:06 -0400
In the amount of time it took you to type out this treatise, you could have called Tashjian Towers, ordered a new base, and then still had time left over to walk into the kitchen and make a nice turk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00049.html (13,101 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:17:26 -0700
I needed a new base for my WT-51 when I first moved it from Portland to the OR coast. Looked at the base dwg I had, figured how much time, labor, material, and new swear words it would take me to bui
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00051.html (15,082 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 17:20:04 -0700
Well said, Chris. Actually, 1/2x4x4" angle is enough - works for a HDX589 with 4x 1" bolts.;-) UST multi pass welds that custom bent angle to their reinforced "T" base. I've made said design base sca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00053.html (14,380 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Yet another used W51 (base/foundation) ??? de K6LPM (score: 1)
Author: w6rgs@cox.net
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 01:22:15 -0700
Having read your email and the numerous replies, here's my reply. I have a W-51 that I got from an SK estate several years ago. I, too, thought of how much I could save by making my own base. Then, I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-06/msg00054.html (9,497 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu