Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antenna\s+height\s*$/: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: lclarks@nc.rr.com (Larry Stowell)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:55:20 -0400
1. Is there a FCC rule for commercial towers as to the painting of the red and white sections. My xyl is always asking how tall is that tower? 2. I have some tall trees on my new property and am gett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00229.html (7,892 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: b_bradfield@yahoo.com (Brad Bradfield)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Larry and the group - - I've been out of the broadcast engineering business for about 20 years, but the following is still fairly accurate as far as I know. Towers are painted in an odd number of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00230.html (9,610 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com (K4IA@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:44:31 EDT
I don't know how the Trig would work but in the Boy Scouts we learned to measure the length of the shadow. Compare that to the length of a shadow from an object of known height and figure the ratio.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00231.html (8,474 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG)
Date: 10 Aug 2001 10:54:49 -0700
Go to: http://www.faa.gov/ats/ata/ai/index.cfm and download (link at the top of the page) the zip file of the Advisory circular. 73 Mike N2MG ________________________________________________ PeoplePC
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00232.html (9,126 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:07:05 -0500
boy Larry, here's an easy one from my old Boy Scout days. I actually made Eagle. On a sunny day. Pound a pole of known height into the ground so it casts a shadow. Measure the shadow of the stick Mea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00234.html (9,538 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:30:49 -0400
Hello Larry, Here's a thought for you that I haven't heard anyone suggest. My other passion is golfing, and I have a pair of binoculars that measures distance to the pin/flag. The measurement is very
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00236.html (9,750 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: alwilliams@olywa.net (Al Williams)
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 06:18:04 -0700
Here in the Pacific Northwest, where the skies are cloudy all day, I use different method to measure tree height (after I shoot a string over the top of the tree). I measure the length of the string
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00238.html (8,239 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:30:46 -0400
Such rules originate with the FAA, not the FCC. Towers under 200' tall need not be painted, unless they are located near the approach or departure path of an airport. If your tower needs to be painte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00625.html (8,669 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Antenna Height (score: 1)
Author: SJONE@minters.com.au (Jonathan Entwisle)
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 09:10:31 +0830
G'day from Australia I recently built a roof tower for my 3 element triband beam. The antenna sits about 6 feet above the roof and about 21 feet (7 meters) above the ground. I realise that this is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00152.html (9,112 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Antenna Height (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 22:23:36 -0600
A tribander at 35 to 45 ft is a very good DAYTIME antenna on the high bands. It will cover all of the highest angles supported by the ionosphere and is definitely worth the effort compared to somethi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00163.html (7,748 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: k4isv@westky.com (Bud)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 18:00:30 -0500
while much has been said on this subject since rick, nq4i, menitoned his new 10M antenna-- I would lik to place my vote on putting the antenna as high as possible... 9 towers here with lowest at 140
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00259.html (8,315 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 19:28:13 -0600
re: K4ISV antennas You neglected to mention that you are also located on a hill. With rolling ground, it is possible for VERY HIGH antennas to virtually cover ALL angles that the ionosphere will supp
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00265.html (9,777 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 21:35:04 -0400 (EDT)
To K4OJ: Sri, don't have his email adr. Please consider helping me either weekend of Oct. 11 or Oct. 18 on antennas at my home. E-mail if at all possible. de K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00266.html (7,779 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 22:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
I dont think that is possible. What you get from a hilltop is lowering of the lobe. I have done a lot of analysis using N6BV's & K6STI's programs. A single antenna on a hill at a preferred height lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00267.html (8,801 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: marko@robo.fe.uni-lj.si (marko@robo.fe.uni-lj.si)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 97 13:34:09 MET
Re: We would all agree that tophill antenna at optimal height will behave like a stack. At some other height gain peak would not be so pronounced but more wide variety of angles would be covered at l
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00278.html (9,020 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
70 ft. still is the single best antenna height. de K4VUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00316.html (7,684 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] antenna height (score: 1)
Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 11:39:48 -0400 (EDT)
<< 70 ft. still is the single best antenna height. de K4VUD You might want to throw in a few qualifications: 1. For a one tower station, overall good comprimise 2. Abvove reasonably flat ground 3. Ov
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00319.html (8,062 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Antenna height (score: 1)
Author: "John (N1JP)" <radiotech@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 00:40:59 -0000
Would anyone know if it would be worth the investment of time and money to add another 12 ft to my existing tower. It is presently at 48 feet and I was thinking of bringing it up to 60 feet. I'm basi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00213.html (7,070 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna height (score: 1)
Author: "David Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 23:23:51 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "John (N1JP)" <radiotech@nycap.rr.com> To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 5:40 PM Subject: [TowerTalk] Antenna height Would anyone know if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00215.html (7,810 bytes)

20. RE: [TowerTalk] Antenna height (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:41:06 -0600
The higher location will yield a lower take-off angle for improved DX contacts. However, short range contacts may suffer a bit. If you have the means, add the extra height and another tribander. You
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00219.html (8,700 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu