Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antennas\s+in\s+the\s+woods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+antennas\s+in\s+the\s+woods\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] antennas in the woods (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@worldpath.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:17:36 -0400; mee oh my oh. the bottom line is you do what you can and hope for the best. i installed my 160 vertical in the woods 25 years ago. it worked fine. four years ago, we logged the forest significantly r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00338.html (7,630 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] antennas in the woods (score: 1): Author: "Robert Shohet" <kq2m@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:47:08 -0400; You can ALWAYS do more. The question is, What difference in performance can you reasonably expect, for a contemplated investment of additional time and money? "Hope for the best?" I think that's pre; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00341.html (7,570 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]