Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+benefits\s+to\s+7\s+additional\s+ft\s+of\s+height\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+benefits\s+to\s+7\s+additional\s+ft\s+of\s+height\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] benefits to 7 additional ft of height? (score: 1): Author: jtolbert@gremlan.org (The Tolberts); Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:41:38 -0500; I have an opportunity to raise my 50' Roh 25 house-bracketed tower another 7'. With the mast this would put my C3E at 67 ft instead of 60' . This may be a little to much tower above the second bracke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00323.html (7,269 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] benefits to 7 additional ft of height? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:41:14 EST; First, another seven feet is only about 11% of a wavelength on 20M. I don't think you'd see much difference by increasing the height by 11%. You might model it and see. OTOH 'higher is better'. Secon; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00344.html (7,879 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] benefits to 7 additional ft of height? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:17:30 -0500; How high is the bracket? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00371.html (7,468 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]