Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+blown\s+10m\s+section\s+of\s+ICE419\s+again\s+\-\s+N1NK\s+comments\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] blown 10m section of ICE419 again - N1NK comments (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Spears" <n1nk@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 20:06:00 -0400
Read the recently published QST review of bandpass filter boxes. The ICE is definitely "fragile" at 100 watts going into it at any swr. Jim/N1NK _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00047.html (6,891 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] blown 10m section of ICE419 again - N1NK comments (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:18:34 -0500
I do not recall this article, however I have read a number of complaints on contesting.com about blown 10m sections with the ICE filters. FWIW, I have had good lucking with Dunestar bandpass filters
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00049.html (8,033 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] blown 10m section of ICE419 again - N1NK comments (score: 1)
Author: Alex K2BB <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 22:02:36 -0400
It was in NCJ, not QST ... AM _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00051.html (9,729 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] blown 10m section of ICE419 again - N1NK comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:12:44 -0700
And I was the author. :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00052.html (7,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu