Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+braid\s+and\s+high\s+current\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+braid\s+and\s+high\s+current\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] braid and high current (score: 1): Author: Nick Pair <daweezil2003@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:17:38 -0700 (PDT); Hello all, The first problem with braid is that the stuff forms a coating of copper oxide around each strand that is nonconductive. This coating makes each wire like a individual conductor with a res; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00638.html (8,511 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] braid and high current (score: 1): Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:37:29 -0500; If the strands touch each other or not that does not change the total resistance of the cable. This does not change the resistance of the cable. It will not cause some strands to vaporize. It can ch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00639.html (10,678 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] braid and high current (score: 1): Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@hughes.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:00:23 -0500; Pardon me, but this is the biggest collection of garbage on this subject that I have seen. The braided copper conductors I have seen in explosives storage were about 1/2 inch in diameter, and were br; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00642.html (10,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]