Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+building\s+code\s+questions\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 03:25:08 -0500
Hi. I'm planning a 100-foot Rohn 55 tower with a pier pin foundation. On Thursday I noticed it had been about 40 days since my tower building permit application got zoning approval and the appeal per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00573.html (12,072 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 06:49:44 -0800
The times they are a changin' Many jurisdictions require UFER (or, in "code speak": Concrete encased grounding electrode) these days, with no real exceptions. If they periodically adopt the revised e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00575.html (15,030 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:52:45 -0500
I don't know the exact language of the requirement yet, so it's not clear they will require a welded rebar cage. According to the Polyphaser book, wire-tied rebar has been shown to be a very effecti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00585.html (10,889 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:41:25 -0800
Ahh.. now I understand... these aren't RF radials, they're part of your electrical grounding system. Well, you need to get the relevant codes and make sure your design complies with the *local* codes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00590.html (11,379 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:43:56 EST
Have any of you out there in TT Land been required to install a Ufer ground? What's the best way to bond the pigtails to the rebar? There was a real good post here at some point that pointed out the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00596.html (8,737 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:11:47 -0500
many shapes and sizes - one with perfectly formed sides is the exception. Even if the sides of the hole have sloughed, just fill the hole with concrete - no muss, no fuss with forms and you're confor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00003.html (7,664 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] building code questions (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:17:06 +0000
All: Pouring against undisturbed earth is quite ok. As long as you have the required reinforcing bar clearance (3" per ACI) pour away. Pier and pad foundations (spread footings, isolated footings) th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00015.html (9,733 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu