Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+cde\s+ham\s+II\s+versus\s+HAM\s+IV\s+\/\s+HAM\s+V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+cde\s+ham\s+II\s+versus\s+HAM\s+IV\s+\/\s+HAM\s+V\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] cde ham II versus HAM IV / HAM V (score: 1): Author: ricel@openlink.com.br (Ricardo & Celia); Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 09:37:32 -0300; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0066_01BE8CA3.BF423E20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does anyone know if the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00581.html (8,329 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] cde ham II versus HAM IV / HAM V (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 10:02:54 EDT; The rotators are the same. The difference in that the Ham V offers their digital control unit instead of the analog one for the Ham IV. If your question has to do with the bolt pattern on the bottom,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00582.html (7,454 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] cde ham II versus HAM IV / HAM V (score: 1): Author: N0OEL@aol.com (N0OEL@aol.com); Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 21:00:12 EDT; That four hole base of the Ham M, Ham II, Ham III, and Ham IV are all identical. And I believe so is the Ham V! 73 Mike k0BUD -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00585.html (7,094 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]