- 1. [TowerTalk] crank down automation was Re: Crank Up towers (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:52:15 -0800
- While this is easily implemented, it's non trivial to do it safely. Just a few issues pop to mind with automated systems capable of serious damage: 1) What if the wind comes up and the crankup wedges
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00448.html (11,312 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] crank down automation was Re: Crank Up towers (score: 1)
- Author: "Jason Creager" <jason@creager.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:05:42 -0800
- I can't find the webpage, but I have posted a message on HomeSeer's forum to see if anyone knows where it is. Judging from what I remember of the complexity of the rest of the house, I cannot imagine
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00464.html (11,640 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] crank down automation was Re: Crank Up towers (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:25:31 +0000
- A slightly frivolous reply to a very serious question... The Royal Navy's way of dealing with the risks around remotely operated gun mountings is to post a helpful warning notice. I found this messag
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00565.html (9,650 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu