Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+de\-rating\s+tower\s+wind\s+loading\s+limits\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: henry@rio.com (henry gillow-wiles)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 19:34:21 -0800
I have a crank-up tower rated at 30 sq. ft. for a 50 mph wind. I have 20 ft. of chrome-molly mast with 4 ft. in the tower. I want to de-rate the wind load for 70 mph. How do I do this and what effect
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00244.html (8,224 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: dick@libelle.com (Dick Flanagan)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 20:04:47 -0800
Pay for a PE to work the numbers for you, Henry. If you will be going for a building permit, you'll have to do that anyway. I have a US Tower with similar specs to yours: 30 sq ft at 50 mph. I live i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00245.html (9,751 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 17:37:59 -0800 (PST)
Hi Henry, Let me think "outloud" about this for a minute or two. First, when the wind goes from 50 to 70 mph, the forces on objects (towers and beams) DOUBLES since it goes up with the square of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00259.html (9,764 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: UpTheTower@aol.com (UpTheTower)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 22:34:11 EST
That would be the safe/correct way to go. But, to give you a ball park guess, I'll go though a couple equations that everyone could apply to their particular case. Let's start with the 50 MPH vs. 70
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00261.html (11,004 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Hi Henry: I don't like my OWN answer to this and I will revise it as follows: and beams) DOUBLES since it goes up with the square of the wind speed. assume the tower equals 20 square feet of load by
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00262.html (11,069 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 00:51:13 -0500
let's seen I don't think this is correct. I believe that the tower cross section is included in the standard engineering calculations to determine maximum antenna wind load. I'm no PE, but it looks t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00265.html (14,626 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: bhorn@netcom.com (Bruce Horn)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 22:56:56 -0700 (MST)
Hi, As a data point regarding de-rating crank-up towers as a function of wind speed and mast height, here's the results of the calculations I did on my U.S. Tower HDX-589 based on the professional en
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00266.html (8,719 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: wb4mnf@atl.org (Bob Duckworth)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 18:35:10 -0000
let's seen Tri-Ex provides this if requested. It's part of their drawings and calculations package. I don't recommend purchasing a tower without obtaining the permit to put it up first! FWIW it cost
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00274.html (8,325 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] de-rating tower wind loading limits (score: 1)
Author: Chad_Kurszewski@csg.mot.com (Chad Kurszewski WE9V)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 07:33:16 -0600
That would be the safe/correct way to go. But, to give you a ball park guess, I'll go though a couple equations that everyone could apply to their particular case. Let's start with the 50 MPH vs. 70
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00309.html (10,985 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu