Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+dealing\s+with\s+insurance\s+dweebs\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: David Vondrasek <n5ito@davidv.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:53:44 -0500
Welp here is were I'm at now after talking to an Insurance Adjuster. This isn't looking all that good as I can see, I had to spend 30 minutes explaining to him is was not a room full of AM/FM Stereo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00529.html (9,603 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:05:40 -0500
I hear after a claim like this you may end up paying more in the long run than your loss. That's because insurance companies usually charge more in the future for clients with a record of small claim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00530.html (11,759 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 12:47:43 -0400
I use the policy through the ARRL for everything except the tower. That way there is no problem figuring out what is what. With them you also have to provide Make, model, and serial number as well as
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00532.html (9,472 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:32:49 -0000
Dave - I understand your frustration and, yes, insurance adjusters are not usually familiar with ham radio. But I can tell you if you go into this with the attitude that the insurance guy is a jerk a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00536.html (13,471 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] dealing with insurance dweebs (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 17:45:56 -0400
W3YY's comments on the topic of treating the adjuster like a professional need seconding. I assumed that to be the case, because I make a practice of treating most folks that way. My suggestion of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00537.html (7,630 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:43:36 -0700
Presumably, then, you have insured the "value" of the equipment as opposed to having a "replacement cost" policy? If they are going to put you through standard depreciation schedules, you're probably
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00538.html (13,994 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Dealing with Insurance Dweebs (score: 1)
Author: W9KO@aol.com
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:17:23 EDT
''Dealing with customer dweebs'' Customer buys cheapest policy he can find from the ''geko'' insurers, and then complains, when loss is not up to even ''Buick '' standards. __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00539.html (7,258 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu