Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ferrite\s+clip\-ons\s+\&\s+OCF\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ferrite\s+clip\-ons\s+\&\s+OCF\s+dipoles\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ferrite clip-ons & OCF dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 11:31:32 -0400; OK...this to some degree repeats a thread from two years ago, but I'm looking for validation of my thinking on feedline treatment for an Off Center Fed dipole...in this case known as a Carolina Windo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00144.html (8,518 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] ferrite clip-ons & OCF dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 13:04:50 -0500; It's difficult to do that without considering how the antenna works, or is intended to work. When you place (an effective) choke balun on the coax, you are essentially insuring that the coax does not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00148.html (8,545 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] ferrite clip-ons & OCF dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 21:13:23 -0400; choke topic. Jim, A few comments. To be most effective the ferrite needs to be placed at a point where common mode impedance is low. It also has to be placed at a point where the change it makes red; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00151.html (10,995 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] ferrite clip-ons & OCF dipoles (score: 1): Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:16:58 -0700 (PDT); If openwire has too big a profile, how about 300 ohm twin lead? I have used this on OCF dipole fed about 30% from one end. The twin lead ran to a ground mounted grounded balun, then coax to the shack; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00161.html (7,927 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]