Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+fiberglass\s+guys\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+fiberglass\s+guys\.\.\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:23:16 -0700; Sorry Bill... I guess I look at it differently.Not to drum up more comments about patterns and such (which I will live with better than a tower coming down) but in my opinion, no disrespect meant at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00672.html (9,251 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera); Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:33:00 +0000; in my opinion it is "cheaping out" that has people going to non-steel. It is the desire to save TIME on cutting and installing insulators on the EHS steel cable and instead going to inferior guying (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00673.html (8,873 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:37:49 EDT; I think there is pretty much common agreement that just guying with long stretches of EHS without putting any breaks of 502s in it is mechanically the best way to go, and for most stations it is the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00674.html (8,326 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <RXDesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:42:44 -0700; I knew someone would have to be offended.... my apologies as an offense was not intended. Funny that you felt "comfortable" with Bill's statement about "cheaping out" when it was directed at those in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00675.html (10,386 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "AA6DX - Mark" <aa6dx@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:54:20 -0700; I agree with Bill .. I have never had any qualms about monkeying about on a Philly installation .. I did not care too much about the mid-8Øs self-potting process, but on the other hand I never; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00676.html (9,207 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: Gary.Stone@med.va.gov; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:46:25 -0500; Hi TT, Well, my .02 worth. I have an 80 foot tower with Philly. I have noticed some (but not much) stretch. However, I have a brochure from the company that indicates there will definitely be some "r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00679.html (11,046 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:40:32 -0400; as an offense was not intended. Funny that you felt "comfortable" with directed at those installing EHS! superior to Philly. I misunderstood the original point I guess. I though the idea was being p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00682.html (8,933 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:25:55 -0400; OK, my 02 cents worth. EHS is cheaper (less expensive) than Phillystran, but I don't think by much. In some aspects steel is superior and Philly in others. The stretch is considerably more than steel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00684.html (14,761 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] fiberglass guys... (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:15:37 -0500; How do you know that? When I cut 6700lb Phillystran, it takes a bolt cutter, same as 1/4 EHS rated at 6000lb. In fact, it usually takes more force to cut the Philly. What is the actual difference in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00699.html (8,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]