Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+first\s+post\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+first\s+post\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Bruce <kk5do@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:20:32 -0500; i am new to this list, like a few minutes ago. only because i have had a 40 foot crank up tower with a force 12 c4 atop for some 10-15 years. we are looking for a new house and it will have no deed r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00065.html (8,519 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:26:08 -0600; The archives can be found by going to contesting.com or google archives towertalk. Feel free to ask some questions. I would look at the SteppIR for an antenna that can cover all the bands you are loo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00066.html (7,892 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Mike Reublin NF4L <nf4l@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:14:12 -0400; I second the suggestion to look at SteppIR. 73, Mike NF4L _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00068.html (8,711 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:58:43 -0500; There are decisions that only the original poster can make. We have no idea what his budget is or what his goals are regarding the antennas. The SteppIR and crankup suggestion is very expensive and y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00069.html (8,875 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:21:38 -0500; I agree with John. We have no idea what the parameter for his tower installation are. A 100 foot crank over tower is a prodigiously expensive setup. It is real nice but a guyed tower is fine (particu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00070.html (10,304 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:04:09 -0700 (PDT); Forget about SteppIR antennas! Unless you enjoy mandatory and frequent maintenance, one of these antennas is not for you. I have seen too many suffer mechanical failure where the fiberglass tubes con; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00071.html (11,834 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Bruce <kk5do@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:40:27 -0500; Thanks to everyone that responded. I might be getting ahead of myself as we have not even decided on which property to purchase yet. Let me decide on that, I guess I am just excited that there are no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00072.html (9,557 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 07:29:49 -0700; Agreed! A StepIR IS NOT the end all of antennas. Just because you have one and paid LOTS of money for it doesn't make it the best antenna in many respects. 73 Jim W7RY There are decisions that only t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00073.html (9,959 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:26:49 -0700; Bruce When you say whatever your little heart desires, what would that be? Antennas for an SO2R contest station? DX pileup chasing only? Ragchewing with old friends? And what are your budget constrai; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00074.html (10,985 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:29:11 -0600; Money has nothing to do with selecting a SteppIR. Please show me one antenna that can cover all bands 40-6 wiith NO interaction between the other bands. An antenna that is optimized for each band it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00075.html (13,309 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Drax Felton <draxfelton@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:49:50 -0400; The stepper has fixed element spacing and more complexity and gears and motors to go wrong. My Mosley pro96 lasts forever and there's no mechanicals. It and the steppir too is not ideal in all situat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00076.html (14,196 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] First Post (score: 1): Author: "Wilson" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:13:10 -0400; I see the poster is quite the accomplished ham. Nevertheless, unless one just needs to make a statement it seems to me that 70 is a fine tower height. Look at the literature that explains beam perfor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00077.html (9,155 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 12:14:24 -0400; There is probably no ideal antenna for all situations. I have a Force 12 C3ss and a D104. Wish I had sprung for the 3 el steppir with 40 el loop. Why? Extra elements, WARC, and is physically the larg; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00078.html (9,474 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:20:35 -0700; Seems like the Step is a nice antenna as the element lengths are all correct per band, but how about spacing between elements. Just doesn't seem that there could be a sweet spot that is perfect for e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00079.html (9,037 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:25:03 -0600; Fixed spacing is just fine when you can vary the element lengths. Mike W0MU It and the steppir too is not ideal in all situations. But it works well enough. Money has nothing to do with selecting a S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00080.html (14,261 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:27:02 -0600; When you can vary the element lengths, fixed spacing issues are not a big deal. Are single band antennas going to beat it. Probably. Even in a model single band antenna the sweet spot is one place. R; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00081.html (9,701 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 09:29:57 -0700; On 6/6/2014 8:26 AM, Steve Jones wrote: When you say whatever your little heart desires, what would that be? Antennas for an SO2R contest station? DX pileup chasing only? Ragchewing with old friends?; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00082.html (9,877 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:13:54 -0700; Please show me one antenna that can cover all bands 40-6 wiith NO interaction between the other bands. An antenna that is optimized for each band it is on and does not have 23 other element flapping; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00083.html (12,638 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:25:38 -0400 (EDT); a 40 foot crank up tower with a force 12 c4 atop for some 10-15 years. we are looking for a new house and it will have no deed restrictions. i can put up whatever my little heart desires. i am looki; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00100.html (9,448 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] first post (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 09:37:23 -0700; On 6/9/2014 9:25 AM, K7LXC-- via TowerTalk wrote: If you want the real skinny on triband antennas, our tribander comparison report is the only report in existence that features on-the-air comparisons; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00103.html (8,527 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]