Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+four\s+square\s+box\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+four\s+square\s+box\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:07:22 -0500; Is there a general consensus on preference between the performance of the Comtek and DX Engineering units? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00347.html (7,140 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:17:33 -0500; Hello Jeff: I have tested and used both of these units. With ground mounted mono band verticals - the performance difference between the two was not significant on 80 meters. As a test - we installed; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00348.html (8,651 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:29:19 -0500; Thanks Tim, I thought they would be similar. Any delta in reliability, durability or other kinds of creature comforts? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Hello Jeff: I have tested a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00349.html (8,783 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:48:35 -0300; Hi Jeff DXE have a plus that is the OMNI feature that allow you to select all four antennas 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W --Mensaje original-- De: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00350.html (9,779 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:29:14 -0500; Hi Jeff: As you can see from the on line manuals and photos - they are physically close. The housings are just a little different. I only used the DXE box for a test. I have used the Comtek box for o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00353.html (10,856 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:39:05 -0500; Thanks Tim, Last question. There is a barbed wire fence which runs for many hundred feet in both directions adjacent the location of the 40m and 80m square sites. I assume given the length of the bar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00354.html (11,567 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:40:29 -0400; I have the DX Engineering box and you are going to like the omni direction feature. I don't know if the Comtek box has that. With careful measuring and construction of the array, I am getting 30dB fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00361.html (8,335 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] four square box (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:36:24 -0500; Thanks Mark, I also like that omni mode. It should be easy to tune up because I can measure the current/phase with the VNA using the W8WWV method. Big change for me - my first outdoor antenna since m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00367.html (9,467 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]