Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+getting\s+the\s+ufer\s+ground\s+effect\s+with\s+a\s+burried\s+painted\s+section\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:55:26 -0500
Im pouring concrete for a tower base using a bottom section standing on gravel in the hole. I had assumed that would prove some UFER ground benefit but wanted to ask because before placing the sectio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00045.html (7,081 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <cautery@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 12:54:23 -0500
I am certainly no expert, have no detail information of your environment or tower/foundation design/materials, and I suspect you will get many more competent opinions than mine here, but here is my 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00047.html (8,679 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:13:18 -0700
Hi Jeff, I can't answer definitively about the paint, but for my painted tower buried about 4 ft into the poured base, I set three wide ground straps into the base, bonding each to a tower leg, and b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00049.html (9,527 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:42:44 -0700
* Considering the numbers involved in your average lightning strike, the dissipation potential from even an "ideal Ufer" ground setup in the average tower foundation will likely be of negligible bene
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00050.html (13,352 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: Dick Blumenstein <rcblumen@centurylink.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:43:06 -0400
Hi Jeff Whether it screws up the ufer ground, I really don't know. I just poured a 5'x5'x8.5' hole and was advised to not paint the rebar.  However, because of the requirements of the engineering dra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00051.html (10,897 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <cautery@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:18:25 -0500
Response inline.... ______________________ Clay Autery, KY5G MONTAC Enterprises (318) 518-1389 My statement was directed at the ASSUMED small footprint of the foundation as opposed to most Ufer groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00052.html (13,408 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:33:03 -0400
I LOVE the organization of that problem and your solution with a clear and detailed step-by-step explanation. Reminds me of the very best way to learn and understand a complex concept by thinking abo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00053.html (13,867 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] getting the ufer ground effect with a burried painted section (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 06:28:39 -0400
As a personal opinion and many years of back ground I think the bare metal would be better. The question is "how much better?" It depends on the area of painted metal in the concrete and that depends
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-09/msg00061.html (10,643 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu