Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+grounding\s+elevated\s+vertical\s+for\s+lightning\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <jeff@ac0c.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:09:07 -0600
I have an elevated vertical standing about 75 tall - with 10 elevated radials at about 8. I need to ground the beast somehow for lightning events. Theres a shunt coil between the vertical element and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00133.html (7,714 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:52:00 +0000
Yep, a ground rod or two just like a tower ground would do fine. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://k1ttt.net I have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00134.html (8,152 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:36:11 -0800
NO! The work of Rudy Severns, N6LF, on the topic of elevated radials shows that elevated radials should NOT be grounded, because doing so causes radial currents to be unbalanced, which increases loss
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00143.html (8,234 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:04 -0800
On 2/8/13 10:36 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/8/2013 5:52 AM, K1TTT wrote: What is the best way to ground this antenna? Can I put a few ground rods at the center base and run them up to the radial juncti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00149.html (8,738 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:28:56 -0600
Spark gap it is, then... Thanks for all the suggestions. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie On 2/8/13 10:36 AM, Jim Brown wrote: On 2/8/2013 5:52 AM, K1TTT wrote: What is the best w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00150.html (9,732 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:43:18 -0500
Could he not also ground through an rf choke to bleed off static? Mark N1UK Spark gap it is, then... Thanks for all the suggestions. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie On 2/8/13 10:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00173.html (11,111 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:18:02 -0800
At first that's what I thought, but OP was looking for lightning protection. And, if you wanted to operate top band, for instance, a choke that has high Z at 2MHz is also going to have high Z for lig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00177.html (9,100 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:34:21 -0600
Static bleed is not an issue here, sort of. The antenna is grounded through the antenna switch which has a 50 ohm load on the line when it's not selected (unless that's been zapped). And when the lin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00178.html (10,587 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:50:45 -0500
Why not an RF choke for static drain/noise purposes across a spark gap for direct hit purposes ? Gene / W2LU At first that's what I thought, but OP was looking for lightning protection. And, if you w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00179.html (9,937 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "R.Morris" <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:49:57 -0500
On 02/09/2013 07:34 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: Static bleed is not an issue here, sort of. The antenna is grounded through the antenna switch which has a 50 ohm load on the line when it's not selected (u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00183.html (9,172 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:14:24 -0600
dualband 80/160 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie On 02/09/2013 07:34 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: Static bleed is not an issue here, sort of. The antenna is grounded through the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00184.html (10,586 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:52:22 -0800
Lighting is NOT a DC event, it is an RF event. Chokes block it (until they fry). Not a solution. As AC0C noted, the coax is grounded at the house/shack, as it must be, which provides a DC path anyway
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00185.html (10,049 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:11:06 -0800
There are two elements to the protection. First, the coax shield is bonded to the panel and from there to the rest of the ground system. Second, the gas tube shorts the center conductor to the shield
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00200.html (11,955 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:37:55 -0800
73, Jim K9YC Isn't part of the Polyphaser lightning protection circuit a spartgap? I opened one up and thought I saw a gas tube. yes, a gas tube is basically a calibrated spark gap that fires at some
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00201.html (10,145 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] grounding elevated vertical for lightning? (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:20:24 -0500
On 2/10/2013 3:11 PM, Jim Brown wrote: There are two elements to the protection. First, the coax shield is bonded to the panel and from there to the rest of the ground system. Second, the gas tube sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00202.html (11,899 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu