Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guy\s+levels\s+\?\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:31:43 -0500
Well my plans to go 100' are scrapped to the county restrictions. But I can go 90' with rohn 45. Per Rohn 45g spec the guy levels for 100' are 31', 61 and 94' at 110mpg. The spec for 90' only require
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00560.html (6,680 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:14:00 -0400
You need to consider how you plan on using this tower. If you are going to side mount rotatable antennas, you need to place the guys so they wont interfere. If you are only using the top of your towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00574.html (7,464 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "Roger Kissel" <kc8hz@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:52:01 -0400
Bill Since when did Rohn/Radian get into the OIL BUSINESS - Per Rohn 45g spec the guy levels for 100' are 31', 61 and 94' at 110mpg. mp"G" ?!? All kidding aside, if you want to go 100 feet and the li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00579.html (8,434 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:29:30 -0400
Me personally I would never go more than 40 foot spacing with Rohn 45. That first or lower guy at 59 feet seems very odd to me. My Rohn book says for 90 foot of R45 in 110 mph use 39 and 85 feet for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00581.html (7,473 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "James C. Garland" <4cx250b@muohio.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:07:55 -0600
...If you are only using the top of your tower, I would place the guys at 30', 60' and 90'. John KK9A ** I was under the impression that one shouldn't guy a tower at regular spacings, because the win
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00585.html (7,403 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:10:44 EDT
Add me to the list of those who think 59 feet is to far for the first set of guys. I wouldn't be comfortable with 59 feet using Rohn 55. Climbing the first 59 feet of 45 would definitely be exhilarat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00586.html (7,721 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:12:55 EDT
I was under the impression that one shouldn't guy a tower at regular spacings, because the wind can excite standing vibrational modes in the tower that can lead to failure. In such modes, the vibrati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00587.html (8,065 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:42:54 -0400
All of Rohns spacings are non interger for that reason but I doubt equal spacing would have much effect on a short tower. My 180' 45G is guyed at 40/80/120/160 primarily since it is at the section ju
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00588.html (9,719 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <w2ru@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:47:17 -0400
Yes, I think their desks are all exactly 5 feet apart from each other.... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00589.html (7,598 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:52:59 -0500
I guess it will all depend on how strict the county were I live wants to be. They seem to think that my spec sheet from Rohn needs a official state engineer stamp !! Rohn is charging me $250 dollars
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00591.html (10,929 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "Don Moman VE6JY" <dmoman@mcsnet.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 03:10:51 -0000
Unless the tower was heavily loaded and therefore required it, I would never put the guy at the very top. It is MUCH easier to work around the top of the tower if the guy is 5 feet down. 73 Don VE6JY
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00594.html (7,578 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:29:15 -0500
I was not planing to put it at the top for that reason. The Rohn spec for 90' is for only 2 guy levels. So since the plan iI had for 100' was canceled do to local county zoning I thought why not guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00596.html (9,257 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:39:03 -0700
In theory, too, your (or Rohn's) Kanasas PE will review the design for compliance with local peculiar requirements. (at least, that's why the building department wants wet stamped drawings) I assume
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00598.html (8,249 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:22:17 -0500
That was true in the old TIA-222-F specification. With the more robust girth of current engineers, 5 foot 6 inch spacing has been specified in TIA-222-G. 73 de Bob - K&Oslash;RC in MN --Original Mess
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00600.html (8,380 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:10:16 EDT
be. They seem to think that my spec sheet from Rohn needs a official state engineer stamp !! easier to pay for the stamp. Take the Rohn stamp - two-hundred and fifty bucks is cheap for a PE stamp. No
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00602.html (8,384 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:05:06
Also much easier to tram the antennas up and down when the last guy wire is 5 or 10 feet down. 73 Hardy N7RT _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00605.html (8,702 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] guy levels ? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:08:38 -0400
I use the holes in the top plate for guys which is why I suggested placing the top guy at the top and the tower is somewhat stronger by doing so. Personally, I drop the top guys when installing anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00612.html (8,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu