Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guy\s+rod\s+angle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+guy\s+rod\s+angle\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: n0tt1@juno.com (N0TT@ juno.com); Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 23:30:35 EDT; Interesting threads out there on the guy rod angles... First of all one should DO what the Rohn book says to do; that's most important. But I'm guessing here that most tower installations of the amat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00357.html (18,790 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: Tower2sell@aol.com (Tower2sell@aol.com); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 16:14:44 EDT; The anchor rod angle is not rocket science - it is an attempt to keep the bending in the rod to near zero. This means that at maximum tension the angle of the rod is assumed to be the angle of the fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00477.html (9,024 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1): Author: mikerauh@ic.org (Michael Rauh); Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:25:42 -0400; The rod angle is indeed the angle of the (guy anchor) foundation reactions. Foundation reactions are given in the Rohn catalog for their example towers. In general, we don't know the guy anchor react; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00671.html (9,349 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]