Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+hardline\s+bending\s+radius\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:21:23 -0500 (EST)
Does anyone have a good idea of minimum bending radius for the 1/2 inch cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too sharp but 50"??? I sure that 50" would not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00173.html (7,086 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 07:58:12 -0800
Like Andrew LDF Heliax? 5" is the min bending radius.. The thing to remember is not so much the bend radius, but, rather, you only get to bend it once. Each time you bend it, it work hardens the cop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00176.html (8,182 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:20:27 +0000
The 1/2" stuff I have used could be bent pretty tight, I wouldn't go much less than 1' radius though without proper tools. With proper bending jigs you could probably get it much tighter without kink
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00178.html (8,971 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:02:13 -0800
And not all hard line is created equally in this (and many) regard(s). Some mechanical constructions are more flexible than others. My guideline is not a hard number, but rather to observe what it se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00181.html (8,787 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:30:56 -0800
Conduit benders are one predictable way to bend hardline and I also have some 90 degree bend frames for half inch PEX waterlines. The PEX is easy to kink and doesn't like to stay bent so these are ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00185.html (8,518 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 22:09:17 -0500
On 11/17/2012 9:30 PM, Grant Saviers wrote: Conduit benders are one predictable way to bend hardline and I also have some 90 degree bend frames for half inch PEX waterlines. The PEX is easy to kink a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00188.html (9,262 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:07:20 -0500 (EST)
cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too sharp but 50"??? I sure that 50" would not cause any problems with the cable but ... I recollect that the minimum
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00208.html (8,089 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:22:25 -0800
On 11/18/12 1:07 PM, K7LXC@aol.com wrote: Does anyone have a good idea of minimum bending radius for the 1/2 inch cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00210.html (8,640 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:36:28 -0500
Does anyone have a good idea of minimum bending radius for the 1/2 inch cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too sharp but 50"??? I sure that 50" would no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00213.html (9,595 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:50:54 -0500
Does anyone have a good idea of minimum bending radius for the 1/2 inch cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too sharp but 50"??? I sure that 50" would no
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00215.html (10,683 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:35:01 -0500 (EST)
times It's an Andrew standard for their non-braided coaxes. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00229.html (8,214 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:54:08 -0800
times It's an Andrew standard for their non-braided coaxes. Cheers, Steve K7LXC TOWER TECH of a lot less than Andrew heliax. The RFS stuff uses a corrugated cu center conductor as well as the either
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00237.html (9,145 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 07:50:44 -0500
I recollect that the minimum bending radius for all coaxes is 6 times the diameter. For 1/2" RG-8, that'd be 3 inches. I think that's for coax with braided shield (the RG-8, RG-213) kind. It's an An
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00238.html (10,615 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:43:18 -0800
That's a bit of over-generalization. Both RFS and Andrew make standard and flexible versions of their cables. The construction is virtually identical on comparable versions. -Steve K8LX corrugated ce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00261.html (11,164 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:08:42 -0800
I don't know when they started, but i have about 350 ft of 7/8-in Andrew. VXL5-50, which has what a center conductor with a very pronounced interior thread, and the connector center contact screws in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00263.html (8,894 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] hardline bending radius (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 22:23:54 -0500
That's a bit of over-generalization. Both RFS and Andrew make standard and flexible versions of their cables. The construction is virtually identical on comparable versions. corrugated center conduc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00264.html (12,981 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu