Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+house\s+entrance\s+ground\s+for\s+RF\s+ground\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+house\s+entrance\s+ground\s+for\s+RF\s+ground\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: Bill MacLane <ai4wm@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:28:21 -0700 (PDT); The service entrance grounding conductor required by the NEC is for safety, not rf grounding, not lightning protection, only safety. Properly installed grounding conductors are to prevent a fault cur; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00111.html (17,046 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: Gary Slagel <gdslagel@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:07:30 -0700 (PDT); Thanks for all the input on this. Think I'm going to proceed with tying on to the entrance ground wire but will plan on beefing up the ground system. Also plan on putting up a crank up tower in th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00113.html (9,564 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:21:30 -0400; Geeze, Gary, I toured your photos of mountain top QRP trips. Wow. == Richards - K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00114.html (8,899 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:13:34 -0400; A good ground fault detector will do the latter, but not a good ground. New systems use GFIs that are sensitive enough to grab the wires without feeling a shock (they tell me) and I've seen a demonst; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00116.html (11,149 bytes)
25. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: Eugene Jensen <eugenejensen@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:44:47 -0400; The new NEC code requires Radio Towers ( It not related to any particular service to be bonded and grounded. Wither your code official is up to speed is a matter of where you are. Because my Matt fou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00117.html (12,986 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] house entrance ground for RF ground? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:09:13 -0700; Horse pucky. RF does not need a ground! Antennas do not need a ground. Transmitters do not need a ground. Receivers do not need a ground. A connection to the earth is NOT part of a solution to RFI pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00125.html (9,769 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]