Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inductance\s+of\s+tubing\s+vs\s+bar\s+or\s+strip\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:30:53 -0400
A free-space inductor is first cousin to an isotropic antenna and a free-space dipole -- useful theoretical models, but not much use in the ham shack. The "characteristic impedance" of a stripline tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00376.html (13,465 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:53:57 -0700
Yes, BUT -- a conductor in free space and a conductor over lossy earth are rather different from stripline (a conductor over over ground plane, which is assumed to be highly conductive and lossless).
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00377.html (10,464 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:08:04 -0400
That's why I posted some actual measurements early on in this thread. I couldn't find a model for a inductance of "straight wire over lossy earth". The absolute accuracy of my quick tests probably ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00378.html (11,804 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:40:44 -0700
Indeed.. and I've looked around a lot. The usual "inductance of a single turn loop of an infinitely thin conductor" formula isn't valid for partial turns (that is, 1/4 of a loop doesn't have 1/4 the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00383.html (12,246 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:46:20 -0700
And the length is big, relative to the cross section of the conductor. There are some "end effects" (a piece of the wire at the end sees the field only from conductors on one side of it, and a piece
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00384.html (10,833 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:49:09 -0400
Comments below. Steve, W3AHL -- Original Message -- From: "jimlux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net> Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00385.html (12,774 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:06:38 -0700
OK.. when you did your fixture cal, what did you use for standards (was it the usual Short,Open, Load cal?). I'm curious, because I want to make similar measurements, and I'm always interested in use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00395.html (14,247 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] inductance of tubing vs bar or strip (score: 1)
Author: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:30:05 -0400
Comments below. Steve, W3AHL -- Original Message -- From: "jimlux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: "Steve, W3AHL" <w3ahl@att.net> Cc: "TowerTalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00402.html (17,822 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu