Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inexpensive\s+dummy\s+loads\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:20:51 -0700
I'm looking for inexpensive HF dummy loads for a phased array project. They only need to handle 10 Watts or so, and preferably would have PL259 connectors on them (as opposed to SO239). I have a few
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00504.html (7,252 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Larry Phipps <larry@telepostinc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:37:30 -0400
An excellent source of quality dummy loads is http://ridgeequipment.com/store/page1.html Check out the 75W ones for $9.00. I have checked these out on my HP VNA and they are excellent. Only drawback
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00505.html (8,101 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:55:52 -0700
excellent.. I don't need "excellent" attenuators, just ones that are reasonably stable and can absorb a few watts of power. They are hooking up to something with SO239s, but adapters aren't out of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00510.html (8,869 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:36:18 -0500
Hi, Jim; If your are working HF, a few 2 watt carbon comp resistors in parallel will work Put them in a can if shielding is required, but derate the dissipation somewhat and consider heat sinking the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00511.html (8,025 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:00:06 -0700
I had contemplated such a thing, but I was looking for something that I didn't have to build. There's a difference between 30 seconds to screw a load onto a connector and 20 minutes of getting out th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00512.html (9,205 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Larry Phipps <larry@telepostinc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:07:11 -0400
Another option is to use the 30W, TO-220 style thick film resistors from Caddock. Mouser sells them. They are available for 50 ohms, are 1% precision and non-inductive... and are also very good. If y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00518.html (10,458 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:49:33 -0500
How the memory slips! We used to use light bulbs as dummy loads. It requires some experimenting and measuring to find bulbs that present a suitably matched load for a given power, but they work fine
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00521.html (9,049 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:00:01 -0700
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Hi Red Yeah, makes a good dummy, but also makes a good antenna. I was once playing with a rig into a lightbulb and a guy about 100 miles away came back
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00524.html (7,964 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:21:19 -0500
I better quit this before I draw flames. 73 de Red _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00525.html (9,127 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:58:50 -0500
Sounds like me in the early days ( I haven't been a ham very long). My new rig was just being turned on and the paddles were being connected. I had turned the power down all the way (2 watts being re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00546.html (10,148 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:08:11 -0400
Just think about the power difference to 100 watts that normally gets used. 2 watts is only 17 db down. If a signal is around 20 over 9 with 100 watts it will still be a little over S9 with 2 watts.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00547.html (11,493 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] inexpensive dummy loads (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:57:03 -0400
Just few years back (wasn't all that long ago) when we had the world wide openings on 6-meters I head a station call CQ several times but didn't get an answer. His signal wasn't all that strong but i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00551.html (11,710 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu