Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inverted\s+L\s+tower\s+mounting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inverted\s+L\s+tower\s+mounting\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: aa4nc@aol.com; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:00:13 -0500; I want to upgrade antennas for 160m from my current inverted vee @ 115'. I'd like to put up an inverted L to get some vertical plus horizontal polarization for DX and domestic contesting. My situatio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00266.html (7,677 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:29:58 -0500 (EST); Will, Have you considered suspending an inverted-L, or a T vertical, between your towers? Unfortunately, you're likely to have parasitic effects between any vertical and your two towers, both of whic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00272.html (9,234 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:01:39 -0800; Since you have two towers, you can easily hang a top-loaded Tee, which is even better than an inverted L, because it has relatively little high angle radiation. I've used one for several years, and i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00276.html (8,963 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:15:00 -0800; On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:29:58 -0500 (EST), donovanf@starpower.net wrote: any Good point -- that can certainly happen, but to do much, it requires more than 130 ft of vertical or near vertical conducto; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00277.html (9,110 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: "JAMES HEADRICK" <W3CP@CHARTER.NET>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:27:14 -0500; Will, Those towers are inevitably going to be a parasitic part of your 160m antenna system. If you have a modeling capability you could look at it, or if like me you could just hang an inverted L up; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00279.html (9,687 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted L tower mounting (score: 1): Author: Joe <joe@wd0m.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:09:58 -0700; Hi Will, From my personal experience, my inverted L works fairly well. I have a US Towers TX-455. At the top of the tower I put a "yardarm" out to the side that has a pulley on it to raise and lower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00280.html (10,267 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]