Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inverted\s+vee\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+inverted\s+vee\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] inverted vee (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:28:38 -0500; I would just go right for the calculated adjustment. It usually gets it very close to the desired resonant frequency and you do not waste a lot of time "trimming". If you fold the wire back you can a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00069.html (8,077 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee (score: 1): Author: Edward McCann via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:38:57 -0800; Don: can you elaborate a bit. Ladder line from shack to remote tuner at base of tower then what feed to antenna? More ladder line? What kind of remote balanced tuner? Thanks, AG6CX Sent from my iPhon; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00072.html (9,422 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:25:44 -0500; It depends on the ham's reason for wanting a low SWR. Perhaps they do not want to use an external tuner. A truly balanced antenna would be extremely rare. I've never seen one on 75 including center f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00074.html (10,952 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]