Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+isotron\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+isotron\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: tleaf@hotmail.com (Ted Leaf); Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 03:19:04 -1000; Hi Guys, I was reading Feb. CQ Magazine and saw the article on the Isotron antennas. Quoting: *--near-dipole performance--*. Now has anyone had any experience with the Isotron, especially the 160M ve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00239.html (7,647 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek); Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 14:18:28 -0500; to the antennas that Stan Byquist, W0-something, built in the 1960's up in North Dakota. Can't remember the 'name' he gave his design, but, to me, it also looked like a small bedspring! Somewhere in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00260.html (9,086 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:50:46 -0500; Just when we thought the "don't believe everything you read in an ad" thread was over! To give real near-dipole field strength performance, it would have to be at least 1/4 wavelength long unless th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00263.html (7,641 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:24:37 EST; I used an Isotron 160 meter antenna and was able to work DX up to 1,000 miles away, but needed a different rx antenna as they have a Q which is a killer on QRN- And while I got in the log, I was neve; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00265.html (7,706 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:42:53 -0500; The antennas were called something like "L'il Giant" and actually made a dipole into a small space by folding it up. This introduces imductive loading so the inventor had to cut and try to get the ri; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00275.html (9,504 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] ISOTRON (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@VRINTER.NET (Bob Wanderer); Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:13:26 -0500; Any Towertalkian have any experience -- good, bad, or indifferent -- with the Isotron antennas, especially the one for 80 meters? Thanks and 73, Bob AA0CY List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00109.html (6,852 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:27:05 -0500; Actually the real humor is at: http://www.isotronantennas.com/isohow.htm The text claims Isotron's "work so well" because they have "more area than a 1/2 wl dipole". If I had two slices of bread I c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00034.html (8,900 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:53:27 -0600; I agree. However, careful reading of the Isotron page http://www.isotronantennas.com/isohow.htm revealed no claim of gain or radiation efficiency. Replace the word "Isotrons" with "Dummy Loads" and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00035.html (9,610 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:14:19 -0500; Ignoring all the misstatements about capture area (capture area really has nothing to do with physical size, it is a function of gain and wavelength), they do make a gain claim. "THE PERFORMANCE - I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00047.html (8,864 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:59:43 -0600; You may be reading in something that is not there. No mention of radiating, just transmitting. I know it's a pretty thin line, but a sharp lawyer could probably convince a jury it's not the same as r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00049.html (9,044 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "J. Hector Garcia XE2K" <hector@telecom1.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 13:23:37 PST; Guys: Someone have something to say abouth the isotron 80m Model for Noise enviroment receiving antenna ? if this antenna poor TX performance can give at least a good RX in a noise city? Hector XE2K; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00066.html (10,683 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:05:46 +0000; Clinton word parsing? "Depends what your definition of is is." I seriously doubt that even the chronically dumbed-down jurors so often seated on major cases would buy that one! It is not possible to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00072.html (9,453 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:56:02 -0500; good RX in a noise city? I wouldn't count on that Hector. Most of the radiation from the Isopole system is radiation from the coax shield. If there is any noise near the house, it will probably be w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00081.html (8,950 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:11:18 -0500; mention of radiating, I get it now. Doc cleared it up for me. :-) When they say it transmits as well as a dipole and has larger effective aperture than a dipole (which by definition at a given wavel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00082.html (8,753 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:08:24 -0500; ;^) How could a small loop and light bulb tell us the net radiation from areas of a radiating system? 73 Tom _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00085.html (7,407 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:40:45 -0600; You can transmit into a dummy load, but the amount of resultant radiating will not likely bag many contacts. :) 73, Keith NM5G radiating. Clinton word parsing? "Depends what your definition of is is.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00108.html (10,426 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 20:15:08 -0500; Brett, A loop in the nearfield does not show radiation. A small loop in the nearfield almost exclusively shows the magnetic induction field. Near any antenna the induction fields are the dominant fi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00133.html (9,756 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] isotron (score: 1): Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:20:16 -0500; If it sounds too good to be true, it is. Best bet for an apartment is to get yourself some small enameled wire, like trees, or if on an upper floor, to dangle it down, and use a tuner. I operated fro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00014.html (7,153 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]