Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+kt34xa\s+torque\s+balancing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+kt34xa\s+torque\s+balancing\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:34:57 -0500; TT: I would recommend a trimtab which clamped around the boom, and permits it to be slid in or out, to fine-tune the solution. I did this with an XA 15 years ago, have long since lost the calculation; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00223.html (9,429 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:14:13 -0600; There continues to be a LOT of misinformation and overly complex info floating around on how to torque balance ANY antenna. The EASIEST way to do the calculations CORRECTLY is to buy the YagiStress p; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00225.html (7,961 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:28:12 -0500; TT: A computer program will not estimate drag from the complex shape of the kt34 traps any better than a seat-of-the-pants human. Without a doubt, the program which W0UN suggests will do much of what; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00236.html (8,260 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:10:23 -0600; Unfortunately, Jim, you are making the same mistake that amateur antenna manufacturers and Dr. Dave Leeson (who is ALMOST perfect) made! See below--> You need to read my original posting on this topi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00237.html (9,469 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:04:01 -0600; Let me clarify one thing. Any symmetrical (about the boom) surface areas parallel to the elements will cancel. And surface area parallel to the boom will not. So the ENDS of the traps are not balance; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00238.html (9,471 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:12:20 EST; Rather than attacking the problem of weight balance vs 'weathervane effect' of the KT34XA, wouldn't it be easier to put some extra weight inside the boom on the director end, and move the boom to mas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00239.html (8,450 bytes)
7. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:36:22 -0600; John's post a few back mentions the articles I was trying to cite but could not remember since the paper copies are in Idaho. I suspect that those who wish can find a source of these excellent papers; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00242.html (8,631 bytes)
8. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:37:24 -0600; I have dug out the three articles--a total of 42 pages. If there is enough interest I will spend some time scanning them and making them available. I have asked Tod if he has a web site where they ca; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00243.html (10,093 bytes)
9. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:17:54 -0600; Jim Jarvis and I have had a couple of off-line exchanges. This is a note I wrote to him to try and make sure we both are talking about the same thing. (As my late partner used to say -- A word is wor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00247.html (13,059 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: "Michael Harris" <mike.harris@horizon.co.fk>; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:15:22 -0300; G'day, Pricing on Array Solutions web site for v2.15 is now $79 for the consumer version. An interesting and significant jump from a "measly $30". If you're into mega stacks of long boom arrays I gue; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00250.html (10,496 bytes)
11. RE: [TowerTalk] kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1): Author: "Tod - Minnesota" <tod@k0to.us>; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:05:01 -0600; John wrote, " ... and the add When I read John's outline of the force analysis it joggled my memory. In April of 2002 I had read the three papers John mentions. I discussed them with Lyle, K0LR, and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00252.html (10,041 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]