Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+lightening\s+and\s+uhf\/vhf\s+triband\s+vertical\s+on\s+top\s+of\s+mast\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:04:19 -0500
If a triband vertical (2m-70cm) was placed on top of a mast at the 74 foot level would it be prone to lightening strikes? Would it be better side mount it on the tower? The loss in coverage due to th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00185.html (7,697 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 17:37:06 -0700
If a triband vertical (2m-70cm) was placed on top of a mast at the 74 foot level would it be prone to lightening strikes? Extremely vulnerable. Would it be better side mount it on the tower? Yes, but
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00202.html (8,220 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: k0il@mitec.net" <k0il@mitec.net (Ed - K0iL)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 20:08:34 -0500
On Thursday, 09 September, 1999 1:45 AM, Ron Youvan [SMTP:ka4inm@gate.net] wrote: once the epoxy sets, but they sure can. I posted a question here earlier this year about dual band antennas. I'd now
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00251.html (9,898 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 22:00:21 -0700
You need to protect your sites with a Trevino, "not even God can hit a #1 Iron." And Lee should know; he's been struck by lightning at least twice! 73, Bob AA0CY On Thursday, 09 September, 1999 1:45
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00256.html (10,598 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu