Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+lightning\s+frequency\s+and\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+lightning\s+frequency\s+and\s+towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] lightning frequency and towers (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 07:01:34 -0700; If someone were interested, you might be able to find someone at Vaisala (who run the National Lightning Detection Network) who could take the database of strike locations and match it up against the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00244.html (7,345 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] lightning frequency and towers (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Hemsley" <kev@ida.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 12:38:57 -0600; There is a very interesting short paper on this site that is directly related to the recent lightning thread: "Towers, Lightning and Human Affairs". Here is a quote from the abstract which is discuss; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00276.html (9,671 bytes)
3. RE: [TowerTalk] lightning frequency and towers (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:12:07 -0500; I agree with this assessment. My club has a 2 meter repeater located on a tall building in Houston. The antenna sits on top of the building, mounted to a metal facia running around the perimeter of t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00278.html (11,675 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]