Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+loading\s+coils\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+loading\s+coils\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] loading coils (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:01:56 -0700; Roger, stop stirring the pot! That CB antenna works perfect for what it was designed for. The design was stolen from a guy named Kale who builds the "Penetrator 10K" antenna. I know you are not so na; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00286.html (8,192 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] loading coils (score: 1): Author: Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:07:20 -0500; I think some of the comments regarding 11 meter ops is that there are even (supposedly) 10K capable antennas in a 5 watt service. The illegality issue that seem to alway come up with 11 meters, both; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00290.html (9,870 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] loading coils (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:05:09 -0400; Which brings up the question: which is better, the old WARC-7 with linear loading, or the new ones using what they call the Sigma series 30 for the two 30 meter elements. It drops the required spacin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00296.html (9,533 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]