Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+micro\-reflectors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+micro\-reflectors\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 11:26:26 -0000; Hi Bill et al, Good luck with your new business venture. Regarding your comments yesterday about more specialized reflectors (microrelflectors?) I offer the following comments: I find towertalk to be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00070.html (9,155 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 07:37:46 -0400; It seems to me that the history of ham reflectors demonstrates that spinning off sub-topics is a hard thing to do. Certain major subject areas, like Towertalk, successfully spun off CQ-Contest. Other; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00072.html (8,696 bytes)
3. Re[2]: [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: Bob Otto <N8NGA@one.net> (Bob Otto); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 08:44:15 -0400; Hello Pete, I agree with your comments. I belong to several (6-8) reflectors, and there are a couple of conclusions I've drawn. 1) TT is the most interesting to me because it covers such a wide varie; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00073.html (10,479 bytes)
4. Fw: [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: kq2m@mags.net (Robert Shohet); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 09:44:15 -0400; Hi Bill, First of all, let me thank you for providing the resources for the reflectors and the forum by which we can all learn and share information. I echo most of Barry's comments in that I have le; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00075.html (11,281 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 10:13:32 EDT; The TowerTalk reflector IS a "micro-reflector" that started out as tower and antenna discussions on the CQ-Contest reflector. The problem was that although contesters have an avid interest in towers; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00077.html (9,107 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 14:16:33 -0400; I also have the problem of many emails to deal with, both on the reflectors, and at work. The typical load at work can be anywhere from a couple dozen to over 400. A lot of those are noise, some are; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00081.html (10,876 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:47:58 -0400; Maybe we need to split towertalk into towers and antennas. Seems we have more traffic regarding tri-banders and antennas than towers. This should inprove the S/N ratio. 73 Dave K4JRB List Sponsor: Ch; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00086.html (8,133 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: antipode@ne.mediaone.net (antipode); Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 18:34:06 -0400; I agree Bob. Further it seems to me a micro-reflector is another example of a solution looking for a problem so prevalent in today's world of the home PC. A central antenna reflector such as TowerTal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00093.html (12,598 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN); Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 19:26:37 -0400 (EDT); So my feedback on this post is this... Probably most people on this reflector think it is FB. They are still subscribed. There are MANY people who have vanished from this list who are very knowlegabl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00094.html (15,136 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 21:17:37 -0400; IMO, digests are almost no help. I find it far more difficult to page through a digest for the subjects I'm interested in (not to mention replying to or saving a particular message) than dealing with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00100.html (8,689 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 12:18:44 -0600; That is my position. N4KG Personally, I enjoy the (limited) variety of topics on TowerTalk. Typically, most topics run their course fairly rapidly and we move on. Haranging over off-topic criticism o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00153.html (10,612 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] micro-reflectors (score: 1): Author: nn4t@bellsouth.net (steve); Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 16:10:03 -0500; I woiuld second Tom's position here. My life is as busy as anyone's. Because of my subscription to several reflectors, some amateur related, my volume of email is at least 100 messages a day and some; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00163.html (12,458 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]