Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+mismatch\s+loss\s+and\s+SWR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+mismatch\s+loss\s+and\s+SWR\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 12:46:38 -0400; Hi Steve, Naw. Tell it like it is (or like it isn't, hihi) will That is conditionally true IF you are considering the reduction in generator power output and ONLY if the generator meets certain well; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00680.html (10,868 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 17:39:23 -0700; Tom, I hope you will look at that sentence again. This thread is getting to the point where we're misleading a lot of people. There is no such thing as Antenna VSWR. There is something called VSWR an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00684.html (8,927 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 19:59:18 -0400; Yikes! I didn't mean to start this particular thread. I recall one just like it on the amps reflector. Eventually, we all got down to the same terminology and conclusions that are emerging here. In E; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00705.html (11,023 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 21:37:53 -0400; Reread your mail Ed. You are "crediting" me for statements I never made. Nope. That statement is untrue and it sure didn't come from me. I'll say. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00725.html (8,015 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 22:07:18 -0400; (like the that maximum a a is Not quite. It only makes one trip Dick, and some of the concepts in the text above are incorrect. This is not the proper reflector for a discussion of PA's, or conjugat; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00726.html (11,954 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: davidc@bit-net.com (DavidC); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 22:32:46 -0400; discussion only system Thanks for sharing this, it simplifies this greatly for me! Quick clarifications: 1. Loss issues in the system only become significant if when multiplied by 3 they are intoler; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00728.html (9,487 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 23:07:48 -0400; I'm sure Tom will answer, but I can't resist taking a stab at it: if the total system loss is 10%, 900 watts will be radiated by the antenna. The power really only flows in one direction, right? Of c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00731.html (9,900 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: T93m@aol.com (T93m@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 08:49:30 EDT; Hi Tom, ALL YOU say Is correct "BUT" , Please finish with explanation of Conjugate Matching theorem (siplyfied) and give us more light on how it's realy work and why...most of us are geting tired to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00742.html (8,287 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] mismatch loss and SWR (score: 1): Author: rhummel@cheshire.net (Robert Hummel); Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 13:15:53 -0400; It seems intuitively that if this were true, you'd never hear anything when you switch to RCV. Recipricocity must apply in both directions. It's been a while since I designed a tube rig, but I'm pre; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00767.html (9,019 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]