Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+more\s+questions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: k1my@nlis.net (Bruce Makas)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 11:29:39 -0400
I'm thinking of: 90 foot Rohn 45 tower 40 meter beam KT34XA wire on 80 & 160 1. For the 40 meters, I have a choice. Would you go with 3 element KLM or Cushcraft 2 element 402CD? If the 3 element KLM,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00741.html (7,849 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 12:01:50 EDT
Over the years I've had 3-4 KLM 40M yagis from 2L to the 4L 'big one'. I got rid of all of them, installed the 402CD and I've never regretted it. The 4L KLM never played like you'd think an antenna t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00743.html (9,216 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: n8gan@concentric.net (KEN KOCH)
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 21:20:04 -0400
think about the 1 wavelength rule, or as close as you get to it. 40 on top, tri-bander at 70'. we've got some NICE working stations up here just like that. ken 73 simple and works well. -- FAQ on WWW
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-04/msg00769.html (6,953 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 06:29:35 -0700
Still agonizing over a way to afford to get the antenna in the air when we move to our new QTH. Since it is going to take many months (if not years) for me to save money for ham purposes now that I'm
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00555.html (7,935 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 10:42:22 -0400
Used to be PSNH (our local power company would let you haul them away. I used 6 for my pole barn. However, in a sign of "infinite wisdom" our govt (state, Fed, I don't know) has classified them "tox
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00558.html (8,994 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: w2xx@cloud9.net (w2xx@cloud9.net)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 10:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Frank: I personally don't own an LM-470, but my friend K2WE does. The tower has been up for the past 15 years or so, with a variety of HF and VHF antennas stacked above the top of the tower on a f
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00559.html (8,522 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: K2JAS@worldnet.att.net (Roger L. Elowitz)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 14:06:25 -0400
Hi Craig and all, I believe you are referring to the fact that the poles are impregnated with creosote or something like that... which IS carcinogenic (isn't everything?) so they don't want you burni
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00562.html (10,966 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 10:23:09 -0700
I checked on pole prices a few years ago, and they were much cheaper than you anticipated. A 90 foot, Class 3 (very heavy grade pole) was less than $900.00 fob the Portland shipping docks. Check with
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00563.html (7,978 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] more questions (score: 1)
Author: dietz@texas.net (Chuck Dietz)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 23:04:09 -0500
No, but it might kill the grubs & then the moles will go to Ohio? Chuck, KE5FI -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00626.html (7,915 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu