Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+multiband\s+vertical\s+dipole\s+with\s+a\s+tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+multiband\s+vertical\s+dipole\s+with\s+a\s+tuner\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] multiband vertical dipole with a tuner (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:13:24 -0800; So.. I'm a big believer in simple antennas, and dealing with matching separately from the mechanical designs. Jim's vertical dipole, basically a wire with coax and a choke is sort of the epitome of "; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00293.html (8,664 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] multiband vertical dipole with a tuner (score: 1): Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:03:49 -0500; Jim, I will admit to some prejudice in this discussion but you have peaked my interest. I do use a 10-40M 1/2 wave vertical. Why a vertical dipole instead of a half wave end fed vertical? The pattern; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00294.html (10,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]