Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+new\s+AN\-Wireless\s+tower\,\s+floundaion\s+question\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:42:39 -0700
Hello All, As mentioned previously I am stick-building (like a giant erector set) a new AN-Wireless HD-80. I will be posting photos at: http://s14.photobucket.com/albums/a317/k0hps/Tower%20Project/ i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00715.html (9,141 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:55:47 +0000
JC: It's nearly impossible to undercut safely the full size of the pad for this type of foundation. When I was working in the electric utility industry as an engineer, we used these foundations all t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00717.html (9,981 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: William Q Meeker <wqmeeker@iastate.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:42:08 -0500
JC: I put up and HD-70 with a pad and pillar foundation last year. I had the foundation done by the same firm that did the concrete for our new house. They dug the 9x9x5 hole then built the rebar ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00723.html (10,032 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:45:38 -0500
The other consideration about undercutting for the pad is whether the concrete will fully form to the shape of the pad. I certainly wouldn't want to be in the hole forcing concrete into the undercut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00724.html (12,309 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:53:52 +0000
Kelly et al: I used a concrete vibrator like this one: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000224W5/002-7979284-5720834?v=glance&n=228013 to ensure proper concrete flow and filling of the undercut in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00726.html (14,617 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:53:52 -0700
Bill, Labor isn't too much of an issue, we are doing it ourselves. I definitely want the 5x5 vs. 9x9 pad in the yard when we are done. I prefer a single pour too, but how did they keep the concrete f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00727.html (10,445 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: William Q Meeker <wqmeeker@iastate.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:44:52 -0500
JC: The forms did take some time to build. As you can see from the pictures, the pillar was poured first. I am sure that some of the concrete did squish out the bottom at first (and this is good), b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00733.html (11,012 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Goldman <k3dua@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:44:13 -0400
JC, I guess the item I would look at is the total cost/effort. Yes, the pad-pier uses less concrete and rebar, a cost savings. But is the difference worth the time, and extra effort of 2 pours and re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00742.html (12,440 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:10:29 -0400
JC, Jeff et ux: Without stirring up some who don't like math (it has happened to me before on this subject on this reflector), be careful that you don't exceed the vertical bearing pressure of the so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00743.html (14,699 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:23:22 -0700
Hi Gene & All, After spending 4 hours trying different techniques this morning I have come to the conclusion that Gene is right. I was planning to cut the undercut for the pad with a trapezoidal top
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00746.html (14,845 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Shutt" <kgshutt@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:39:36 -0500
Unless you have very poor soil, one usually pours "neat'. That is there are no forms below grade. The excavtion is the form below grade. There is only a form for above grade cap on the foundation. Ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00002.html (12,356 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:08:36 EDT
new AN-Wireless HD-80. I will be posting photos at: http://s14.photobucket.com/albums/a317/k0hps/Tower%20Project/ if anyone cares to watch it go up and the antenna stack go on it. We just started dig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00006.html (8,736 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 19:01:22 -0700
Hi Steve, You are sure right about engineers not always thinking about the people who have to actually build what they design. In this case, there IS an engineer in the hole and pushing the wheelbarr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00021.html (12,222 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:32:37 -0400
IMHO the tower base designs that utilize some sort of undercutting/belled out at the bottom are stupid and potentially dangerous. In some designs the base is 6-9 feet deep and being that far down to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00316.html (7,881 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu