Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+no\-bend\s+pier\s+pin\s+idea\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+no\-bend\s+pier\s+pin\s+idea\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] no-bend pier pin idea (score: 1): Author: psoper@encore.com (Pete Soper); Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 10:26:23 EST; If I put nuts every few inches on a piece of threaded stock with large flat washers between each pair, would this be as effective for holding in concrete as bending the stock into a "J"? Regards, Pet; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00548.html (7,163 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] no-bend pier pin idea (score: 1): Author: JC_Smith@designlink.com (JC Smith); Date: 26 Mar 1997 12:02:04 GMT; Good question. I recently compared the foundation plans for the "old" TX-472 to those for the "new" TX-472 (US Tower, medium-duty, 72' freestanding crankup). Both towers are very similar. In the old; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00569.html (8,209 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] no-bend pier pin idea (score: 1): Author: w5hvv@aeneas.net (Roderick M. Fitz-Randolph); Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 16:18:44 +0000; == No, the nuts and washers would only afford tensile resistance. They would not afford any real twisting moment resistance. I would opt strongly for the J-bolts that may be purchased at most hardwa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00576.html (7,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]