Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+noise\s+canceling\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+noise\s+canceling\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] noise canceling (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Tow" <ttow1@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:33:16 -0500; Rich, the MFJ 1026 works really well if it is set up correctly. Since most of the noise is vertical you must have a REALLY good vertical noise antenna that will produce a signal to the 1026 at least; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00869.html (7,132 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] noise canceling (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:58:35 +0000; WD4K's post on experience with MFJ box very much like my experience with ANC-4 here. Pretty much can cancel out anything I can pick up with a decent sense antenna - even sea surface radar coming from; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00871.html (7,227 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] noise canceling (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:27:47 -0400; CAUTION: The ANC-4 requires >50 watts to key the switch over relay. If you are using a linear that requires less power or running QRP there is a high probability that you will fry the early front sta; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00874.html (8,746 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] noise canceling (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:25:55 -0700; If you have some extra bucks to spend, DX Engineering is introducing what amounts to a high intercept point version of the MFJ-1026: http://www.dxengineering.com/Parts.asp?ID=1227&PLID=215&SecID=114&; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00875.html (8,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]