Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+noise\s+flow\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+noise\s+flow\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] noise flow (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:59:00 -0000; Mr. Robbins shames me again...I shudda googled it! However, as N4ZR points out, of the first 6 references, three are acoustical, one of them in water and two in air. Two are on-chip noise dealing wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00192.html (7,723 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] noise flow (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:40:33 -0800; In the case of these BPL lobbyists, "sewage flow analysis" would be much more appropriate :):) "Noise Flow Analysis", "Noise Floor Analysis", whatever the guy meant to say, you can take it to the ban; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00209.html (8,822 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] noise flow (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:36:15 -0600; "Noise Flow Analysis", "Noise Floor Analysis" From my semi-extensive experience with newspaper articles about me and various business I have been involved with I am more inclined to believe that any; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00217.html (10,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]