Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+on\s+guying\s+towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+on\s+guying\s+towers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:16:44 -0700; not that i have ever guyed a tower, let alone would ever want to, but in putting concrete pads down for portable buildings/cabins, i always drive 6 foot lengths of 3/4 inch rebar and various angles l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00746.html (7,530 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:27:00 EDT; In a message dated 4/28/05 7:19:58 PM Greenwich Standard Time, w7dra@juno.com writes: i always drive 6 foot lengths of 3/4 inch rebar and various angles leaving 8 inches or so out of the ground for t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00747.html (7,617 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:50:57 -0500; I believe the proper method is given in the Rohn catalog. 73, Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Cqtestk4xs@; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00748.html (8,521 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 20:17:38 +0000; -- I may be misreading and/or misunderstanding Mike's post, but I get the idea he is driving rebar into the ground, and then pouring in concrete. If so, this is a big mistake. Rebar should never touc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00749.html (8,091 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: "Roger K8RI on Tower" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:56:11 -0400; We, or most of us, do use rebar, but it is used to reinforce the concrete and the ROHN catalog has instructions on how to arrange (lengths and bends to make) the rebar. I'm a firm believer that they; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00750.html (9,586 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:08:15 -0700; You're thinking of Ufer grounds (aka concrete encased grounding electrodes), which are the preferred (if not required) grounding method in some jurisdictions. As for concrete blowing apart... Most li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00751.html (9,070 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: "Floyd Sense" <fsense@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:38:21 -0400; In most of the Rohn installations, folks use the Rohn recommended anchor design, which is an appropriately sized block of reinforced concrete that ends up with a few feet of earth on top of it. The g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00752.html (9,560 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] on guying towers (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:18:43 -0400; I do not disagree with the rebar fully imbedded in concrete approach. I do have a question about it tho.....for bridges, overpasses, buildings etc it makes good sense. But for a tower job that likely; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00756.html (8,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]