Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+please\s+advise\s+on\s+terminated\s+vee\s+beam\s+design\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net (corneliuspaul@gmx.net)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 15:08:10 +0100
hello..., i would like to ask the group wisdom for help on the following topic: having learned that the unterminated vee beam is bidirectional and therefore "wastes" radiated power into the backward
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00052.html (9,190 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don Hall)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:38:55 -0600
Con, I don't have a new one, but the 17th edition of the ARRL Antenna Book has a discussion of the terminated sloping V on page 13-9. Suggest you look at whatever edition you have. 73 Don K5AQ List S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00054.html (8,700 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 07:17:29 -0800
A friend, N5RM in north Texas built a beautiful array of sloping V beams which covered all directions. The center was at 200ft and the low ends came to 8 ft posts. A wire ran down each post to a larg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00055.html (10,098 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 10:18:39 -0600
I suspect the SLOPING WIRES may have contributed to the lackluster performance. I use my 80M dipoles on the WARC bands where the horizontal ones perform quite well. The inverted vees are noticably do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00056.html (11,703 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2001 10:56:23 -0800
The best that I have read about for anything terminated is that a wire "radial"? "counterpoise"? be run from the terminating resistor line to ground, in the ground under the antenna wire to the groun
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00060.html (11,393 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: basalop@gte.net (Jim Berry)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 19:03:01 -0800
Hello Con, Though I do not have the data in front of me at this exact moment, I do remember Ham Radio Magazine did run a number of articles on the Vee antenna. One thing that did stick in my head, wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00065.html (9,595 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 03:16:45 EST
"One thing that did stick in my head, was connecting the terminated ends together with a ground wire." Besides the use of radials, out there, by tying the elements together, it made the antenna much
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00068.html (11,880 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 17:41:10 -0800
There was a patent on a terminated inverted "V". I use to have a copy of it. It was and end fed inverted "V" with the far end terminated with a non-inductive resistor. To improve efficiency, I believ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00087.html (10,053 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: basalop@gte.net (Jim Berry)
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 19:09:11 -0800
Hi All interested, There have been many comments by people who know a lot more about this particular antenna then me. The questions may have already been answered, but here goes. As far as terminatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00088.html (10,371 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] please advise on terminated vee beam design (score: 1)
Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE)
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2001 19:34:52 -0800
The patent was US 4511898 Terminated Inverted V Antenna with Matching Transformer. I think that it is a narrow patent with the main part being the matching transformer. Chris opr VE7HCB List Sponsore
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00089.html (10,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu