Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+portable\s+verticals\s+with\s+crummy\s+ground\s+radials\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 17:04:55 -0700
Inspired by the recent article in QEX, I was just doing a bit of experimenting with NEC4 simulating portable verticals with severely restricted grounding systems. That is, say you put up a 30 odd foo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00054.html (9,121 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground radials (score: 1)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:22:19 -0500
...snip... Jim, I have done some testing with radials, ground stakes, and the like here. The literature that discusses the topic at length echos your model's results regarding gain. Very little diffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00055.html (9,903 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground radials (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:21:07 -0700
I've got a book here with some old G.H. Brown data. This is probably ~1 MHz data. It shows about a 6dB difference between 2 quarter-wave ground-mounted radials and 15 quarter-wave ground-mounted radi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00057.html (11,740 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] portable verticals with crummy ground radials (score: 1)
Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 06:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
There is a table in ON4UN's book, table 9.1 which I think addressed your interest. This is reproduuced from that book. 9-1 Resistance of buried radial systems radial # of radials length(lambda) 2 15
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00120.html (10,750 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu