Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+putting\s+a\s+reflector\s+below\s+a\s+75\s+meter\s+inverted\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 09:10:46 -0500
You guys discussion prompted me to look into the "counterpoise" for horizontal wire antennas. I found a brief article here, including some graphs. http://www.arising.com.au/people/Holland/Ralph/count
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00281.html (9,456 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 07:27:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Sun, 9 Sep 2007 09:10:46 -0500, "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@pclink.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- "The horizontal dipole system has a minimum gain of 0 dBi at 51 degrees elevation, wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00282.html (7,928 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:30:09 -0500
I think the 2.53(0.05 dB) number is a typo. He doesn't even say which antenna he is talking about in that paragraph. Assuming it is the Figure 4 graph, the gain difference, looking at his graph versu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00283.html (10,265 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:37:16 -0700
The computations for the graphs were done in NEC2, which, as I understand it, has some shortcomings in dealing with wires near ground. I'd have to see some serious measured data before I placed any c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00292.html (8,121 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: Dennis OConnor <ad4hk2004@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
I have done some tests with a horizontal loop and putting a reflector underneath... Also, one year we had Field Day at my place and had an 80 meter horizontal loop at 35 feet with a reflector loop ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00300.html (7,409 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] putting a reflector below a 75 meter inverted (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:55:40 -0400
Unless someone has access to NEC-4 or some even more restricted military software the best you can do is guess when over anything but perfect ground. Here is where actual work in the great outdoors h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00311.html (9,422 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu