Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+quad\s+with\s+a\s+dipole\s+reflector\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+quad\s+with\s+a\s+dipole\s+reflector\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] quad with a dipole reflector (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:17:00 -0400 (EDT); I'm in the process of getting up a 2 el quad suspended on a caternary system with the apex around 170ft. I got the driven element up OK, but... It appears I will have a bunch of fiberglass guy wires; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00126.html (7,589 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] quad with a dipole reflector (score: 1): Author: RMorris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:13:26 -0400; Look up Quagi. Dont' t remember seeing much on scaling to HF. Is a director better than a reflector? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00130.html (8,482 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] quad with a dipole reflector (score: 1): Author: Jon <kd5sfa@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:03:41 -0500; If you can do a quad driven element and a yagi style reflector and directors you should be good. Even a quad reflector and a dipole driven element works fine. They scale up and down in frequency very; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00144.html (10,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]