Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+radials\s*$/: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: davidw@copper.net (David J. Windisch); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:42:47 -0400; Hi, all concerned: I sent this as a private post, and then thought it might be of wider interest: I'm 'doing' my yearly ground: I have a boatload of those foot-long galvanized spikes, which I put in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00207.html (7,638 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: k3hx@juno.com (tttt ccccc); Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:36:55 -0400; OM, Sounds like a great way to get excersize. I used an electric lawn edger (essentially a power saw on wheels at the end of a stick) to cut slits through the sod about 2-3" deep. Pushed in the wire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00219.html (9,678 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: "arholub" <arholub@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:52:14 -0000; Possibly you could help with an ongoing discussion about radials. I have a roof mounted Hustler 6BTV. One friend, as well as Hustler, recommends that radials should be cut for the individual frequenc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00024.html (7,645 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: "Steven Gehring" <stevekz9g@speakeasy.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:30:39 -0700; Since your Hustler vertical is above ground and roof mounted, I would install at least one individually cut and tuned 1/4 wavelength radial for each band of operation. Four or more would be better. T; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00040.html (9,950 bytes)
5. RE: [TowerTalk] radials (score: 1): Author: Mike <nasfred@1bigred.com>; Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:27:10 -0400; Something to try for roof mounted vertical is to staple aluminum foil to the roof rafters in the attic and then tie it to vertical's radial system . At 03:30 PM 9/2/03 -0700, Steven Gehring wrote: Si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00528.html (11,027 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Edward L Bruns <edbruns@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:19:02 +0000; For the winter, I put up an Inverted L with TWO 130 foot radials 7 or 8 feet off the ground, high enough to avoid 'deer hits'. Is it worth the effort to raise them to 16' as many recommend? Ed, W3EKT; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00675.html (6,980 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "K3SV, Bill Gillenwater" <k3sv@direcway.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:58:06 -0500; Question regarding elevated AND ground radials. A few have mentioned using both elevated and ground radials under inverted L's and towers, etc. I have recently installed 4 full size elevated radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00823.html (7,886 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Ron & Madhavi" <mchilkuri@kasnet.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:49:43 -0500; On a related topic, how much (minimum) should a radial be elevated off ground to justify (in terms of performance) calling it an elevated radial on 160m? Is there some rule of thumb minimum elevation; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00825.html (9,603 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:56:31 EST; I would you suggest you look into Gull Wing radials................I know for 80M, the post height was suggested at apprx. 10 feet, I assume for 160M, you would be ok with 20 foot post coming off the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00826.html (6,971 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Edward L Bruns <edbruns@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:53:46 +0000; The 'experts' say elevated radials for 160 should be 16 feet off the ground. And the feed does not have to be up there, it can be at ground level, just slope the radials up at a 45 degree angle. Ed,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00006.html (6,565 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Edward L Bruns <edbruns@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 02:10:27 +0000; On the first of December I put up an Inverted L for 160 with TWO 130 foot elevated radials, all that I can string out. Last week I added sixteen 80 foot radials on the ground, again, the longest I co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00054.html (7,277 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:13:34 -0600; Would the lightning protection provided with numerous bare radials fanned out on the surface of the ground from a ground mounted vertical antenna be greatly reduced or eliminated by using insulated r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00600.html (7,174 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: kd4e <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:05:15 +0000; Those radials are for RF, not lightning protection. They may actually gather energy from a nearby strike and inject it into your system! -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00601.html (7,857 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:12:22 +0000; Medium wave bc stations routinely rely on their radial system for lighting protection (among other things). A pair of electrodes with a roughly 1/2 inch air gap is a standard component on their tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00603.html (8,998 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:16:05 -0800 (GMT-08:00); See here... http://www.earthsignals.com/Collins/0020/0008_1.jpg --Original Message-- Medium wave bc stations routinely rely on their radial system for lighting protection (among other things). A pair; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00605.html (8,063 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:27:25 +0000; Dino: Thanks for the very interesting photo, which raises a few questions: 1. What are the pairs of loops at the base? Torroidal transformers for the feedlines? 2. Is that a pier-pin base at the narr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00606.html (9,161 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:23:03 -0800 (GMT-08:00); The loops at the base of the tower are Austin Transformers. They power the steady burn lamps and the beacons. It is a pier-pin base. Gravity holds the tower on the base (and the pin helps too). Here; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00609.html (10,297 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:25:26 +0000; Dino: the In other words, they supply Austin power? Thanks for my learning experience for the day. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F I'm sorry. I'll stop now. _______________________________________________ See:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00610.html (7,881 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: "Dudley Chapman" <chief@thechief.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:25:21 -0500; Gary, I am now officially confused. Suppose I built a vertical and ran 40 0.2 wavelength rf radials of insulated #14 wire along the top of the ground. Suppose I had a single ground rod near to and c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00618.html (9,532 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:06:00 +0000; Dudley: Belts-and-suspenders. That's what I did, FWIW. On my tower I installed about 135 feet of #2 solid tinned copper ground wire buried about eighteen inches. I welded this wire to twelve 8-foot l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00628.html (10,170 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]