- 1. [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas Tow" <ttow1@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:08:30 -0600
- Can anyone point me to some good pics of either the falling derrick method of raising a 50' 2 1/8 alum vertical...actually 4 of them OR another recommended method. I need to be able to do this by mys
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00265.html (7,499 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:43:21 -0500
- Tommy, Another option is to use a bucket truck (if the location is appropriate...ie. no nearby power lines, etc). They can be rented very cheaply, and it eliminates all the need for the derrick hardw
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00266.html (7,625 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:52:58 -0500
- Never rolled a bucket truck I take it? <:-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2 www.rogerhalstead.com ____________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00267.html (8,797 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:54:08 -0500
- Never rolled a bucket truck on soft ground I take it? <:-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's oldest Debonair CD-2 www.rogerhalstead.com _____________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00269.html (8,440 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Makins" <tim.ei8ic@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:12:10 -0000
- Try http://www.n6rk.com/irrigation.html 73s Tim EI8IC www.mapability.com/ei8ic Ham Map Heaven. Free Stuff xyl _______________________________________________ _________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00270.html (8,610 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:02:09 -0800
- Good heavens, 50 ft of 2" Al is a totally trivial task for the falling derrick method. There are NO safety issues as long as everyone stays far enough away so that nothing can fall on them. A couple
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00272.html (10,901 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:45:54 -0800
- Why 50'? vs 33' or perhaps 66'? k7puc _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.cont
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00273.html (8,578 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] raising verticals (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:52:13 -0800
- I agree. The method Jim outlines below (using 4 guys) works just fine. I'd adjust the guy on the side away from the pull a bit long while raising, so you can pull it up and over center, and then it w
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00276.html (7,925 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu